Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI)
Lee Index: 6 clinical predictors of major cardiac events after non-cardiac surgery.
Risk Factors (check all that apply)
Disclaimer: Nur zu Bildungszwecken. Kein Ersatz für klinisches Urteilsvermögen.
Über dieses Tool
What Is the RCRI?
The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), also known as the Lee Index, is a validated preoperative risk stratification tool developed by Thomas Lee and colleagues in 1999. It simplifies the earlier Goldman and Detsky indices into six independent predictors of major perioperative cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Each criterion present adds one point, and the total score (0–6) correlates with estimated MACE risk including myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and complete heart block.
The Six Criteria
The RCRI evaluates: (1) high-risk surgical procedure (intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, or suprainguinal vascular), (2) history of ischemic heart disease, (3) history of congestive heart failure, (4) history of cerebrovascular disease (stroke or TIA), (5) insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus, and (6) preoperative creatinine >2.0 mg/dL. Each criterion contributes equally. The original study reported MACE rates of 0.4%, 0.9%, 6.6%, and 11% for 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 risk factors respectively, though subsequent validations have shown somewhat higher baseline rates.
Integration Into Perioperative Guidelines
The 2014 ACC/AHA perioperative cardiovascular evaluation guidelines recommend the RCRI as a first-line risk assessment tool. Patients with RCRI 0 and adequate functional capacity (≥4 METs) can generally proceed to surgery without further cardiac testing. Those with elevated RCRI scores and poor or unknown functional capacity may benefit from pharmacologic stress testing, though routine coronary revascularization prior to non-cardiac surgery is not recommended in most scenarios.
🔑 Klinische Praxistipps
- RCRI was validated for elective non-cardiac surgery — it does not apply to emergency surgery.
- Functional capacity (METs) assessment should complement RCRI scoring in perioperative evaluation.
- The RCRI may underestimate risk in certain high-risk populations, particularly vascular surgery patients.
- BNP/NT-proBNP may add prognostic value beyond RCRI, particularly when functional capacity cannot be assessed.
Key References
- Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk. Circulation. 1999;100(10):1043-1049.
- Fleisher LA, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation. Circulation. 2014;130:e278-e333.
- Duceppe E, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(1):17-32.
Formel zuletzt überprüft: Februar 2026