Zurück zu allen Tools

APACHE II Score

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II — ITS-Mortalitätsrisiko-Vorhersage mit den schlechtesten Werten der ersten 24 Stunden.

Physiologische Variablen (schlechteste Werte in den ersten 24h auf der ITS)

If FiO₂ ≥ 50%, enter A-a gradient. If < 50%, enter PaO₂.

Alter

Chronische Gesundheit (bei schwerer Organinsuffizienz oder Immunsuppression)

Werte eingeben und Berechnen klicken.
0–4~4 % Mortalität
5–9~8 % Mortalität
10–14~15 % Mortalität
15–19~25 % Mortalität
20–24~40 % Mortalität
25–29~55 % Mortalität
30–34~75 % Mortalität
≥35~85 % Mortalität

Disclaimer: Nur für Bildungszwecke. Kein Ersatz für klinische Beurteilung.

Über dieses Tool

Was ist APACHE II?

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is a severity-of-disease scoring system developed by Knaus et al. in 1985. It remains one of the most widely used ICU prognostic tools worldwide. The score comprises three components: the Acute Physiology Score (APS) based on 12 physiologic variables, an age adjustment, and chronic health points for patients with severe organ insufficiency or immunocompromised states. The total score ranges from 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating greater severity of illness and higher predicted mortality.

Wie wird er berechnet

Each of the 12 physiologic variables (temperature, MAP, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygenation, arterial pH, sodium, potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, WBC, and GCS) is assigned 0 to 4 points based on deviation from normal, using the worst values recorded during the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Age contributes 0 to 6 points, and chronic health status adds 2 points (elective postoperative) or 5 points (emergency postoperative or nonoperative) for patients with severe chronic organ insufficiency or immunosuppression.

Klinischer Nutzen und Limitationen

APACHE II is primarily used for ICU quality benchmarking, clinical research stratification, and family prognostic discussions. It should not be used in isolation for individual patient treatment decisions, as mortality predictions are population-based estimates. The original validation cohort was from the early 1980s, and case-mix and ICU practices have evolved considerably since then. Newer iterations (APACHE III, IV) and competing scores (SAPS II, SOFA) address some limitations but are less widely adopted in routine clinical practice.

🔑 Klinische Hinweise

  • Always use the most abnormal value in the first 24 hours — not the admission value or the most recent value.
  • If a lab value was not measured, assume it is normal (0 points) per the original methodology.
  • APACHE II was validated for hospital mortality prediction, not long-term outcomes.
  • The score performs best at population level — avoid using it to make withdrawal-of-care decisions for individual patients.

Wichtige Referenzen

  • Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-829.
  • Bouch DC, Thompson JP. Severity scoring systems in the critically ill. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2008;8(5):181-185.

Formel zuletzt überprüft: Februar 2026